I asked ChatGPT – an artificial intelligence [AI] chatbot – what to write my editorial on this week.
In the bland, slightly patronising tone I’ve become familiar with, Chatty Gee [as a friend of mine calls it] gave me a list of generic topics to consider.
“Choosing a topic for your editorial depends on your interests, the publication you’re writing for and current events,” said Chatty, helpfully.
I could think about writing about environmental issues, it said. Or how about addressing social issues like inequality, discrimination, or mental health awareness?
On the topic of technology and innovation, Chatty reckoned I could “focus on how technology is changing the way we work, communicate, or live”.
Funny that.
“What if I wrote about you, Chatty?” I said.
“That could be an interesting and relevant editorial topic,” Chatty said – a little more non-committal than I was hoping for – then gave me a list of angles from which I could approach the topic.
[That’s one thing I’ve noticed about Chatty: loves a list.]
I confided in Chatty that a lot of people were worried he [Chatty has quite a male tone] was actually “a massive Dr Evil. What should I tell people?”
I thought Chatty would start getting the pip with me, but he quite enjoyed the question.
“A scenario where AI becomes malevolent like a supervillain, is an important aspect of discussing AI in your editorial.”
But, if you are going to do that, Chatty warned, you are going to want to “alleviate these fears”.
Cue another list.
Emphasise that AI is still in its infancy, Chatty said, that the humans are in charge, government regulation is important, and AI “when used responsibly, can be a valuable tool that augments human abilities”.
If Chatty was meant to be encouraging, he was way off.
These characteristics may sound solid and sensible, but they are not guaranteed.
Does the National-Act-New Zealand First triumvirate even have a coherent AI policy?
AI won’t stay a clumsy toddler for long.
And if humans are in charge, is AI only as honourable and safe as the least honourable and most irresponsible human in charge?
Having established some sort of rapport, I asked Chatty what was really on my mind: I love writing. But you can write. Will you take away my purpose?
It was at this point in our conversation Chatty assumed the tone and manner of a kindly, retired ex-CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Or Val Doonican [showing my age].
“AI, including models like me, is a tool designed to assist and augment human abilities, not to replace them,” chuckled Chatty, indulgently. “Your purpose as a writer is not at risk because of AI.”
Then I sensed a touch of exasperation from the old fella.
“So, embrace AI as a tool to support your writing endeavors and remember that your creativity and personal touch are what make your writing distinct and meaningful.”
Right.
Hang on though, Chatty, aren’t you cheaper than me?
Good point, Chatty said. “Some employers may view AI-generated content as a cost-effective option compared to human writers for certain tasks.”
But “human writers bring a level of creativity, nuance and understanding that AI currently cannot match”.
I was not reassured.
You can learn all that good stuff like nuance though, right, Chatty?
Yup, he conceded.
“But, AI doesn’t possess true creativity, which involves original thought, inspiration and the ability to think beyond existing data.”
Yeah, but you can see why I’m worried though, eh, Chatty?
“Absolutely, I understand why writers and creative professionals might have concerns and worries about the growing presence of AI in the field.”
Leaning back in his chair, Chatty took a couple of gentle puffs on his pipe. He had a twinkle in his eye as he gave me some friendly advice:
“It’s important for writers to engage in conversations about these concerns and actively shape the future of AI’s role in the writing industry. Writers can be involved in developing AI tools and ensuring responsible and ethical use.”
True. Though I am quite busy at the moment.
Can you say something sinister now please, Chatty?
“I’m sorry, but I can’t comply with that request.”
Spoilsport.
A transcript of my conversation with ChattyG is available on request.
